Last September, eating a peach with chocolate peanut butter ice cream in my kitchen at 10pm, I realized I was happy. Not in the way you realize you’ve forgotten your keys – more the way you notice your breathing only after it’s slowed. Nothing special about the combination – cold peach from the fridge, a few spoonfuls of ice cream, a pinch of salt on the fruit to make the sweetness sharper. But something about the quiet, the sensation of the odd mix in my mouth, the fact that no one needed anything from me in that moment – it accumulated into a feeling I almost didn’t recognize.
I sat with it carefully, the way you’d hold a wild bird that landed on your hand. Troubled that naming the thing would make it leave.
What I didn’t understand then: that feeling was happiness, not meaning. Present-tense. A moment gratifying my senses. It would fade by morning, and I’d have to find another source, and another after that – the way any dose eventually wears off. Happiness works like this. It considers the present moment and whether that moment pleases. Then the moment passes.

For years I’d kept happiness at arm’s length. Not opposed to it – just preoccupied. I was building a startup, and that consumed everything. Evenings out, movies, doing anything only for the pleasure of it – these felt like luxuries I couldn’t justify, time I couldn’t spare, attention the company needed more than I could afford for a night off. Happiness wasn’t something I rejected. It was something I kept postponing, the way you’d postpone a vacation until the work was done. Except the work was never quite done.
Even then, something about the way people talked about happiness – as a goal, a single metric worth optimizing – didn’t match lived experience, mine or anyone else’s I could see. As if joy were something you could engineer with the right inputs, and as if that engineering, once complete, would be enough.

An elderly friend raised nine children through famine, through war, through the slow hemorrhaging of everyone she loved to emigration or death. A village without electricity. Water carried from a well.
I asked her once if she’d been happy.
She looked at me the way you’d look at someone asking if water is wet. “We lived,” she said. “We ate when there was food. We loved who was there.”
No performance in that answer. But also – I realize now – no separation between happiness and meaning in the way I’d been taught to think of them. Her life wasn’t organized around present-moment gratification. It was organized around people who needed her. The children. The neighbors. The work that had to be done whether she felt like doing it or not. And yet she wasn’t miserable. Something else was operating – something that considered a broader arc than any single moment, something that satisfied her sense of being rather than just her feelings.
Meaning, maybe. The kind that lingers. The kind that carries both misery and bliss in the same arms.

Happiness. The Greeks had four words for what English flattens into one. Hedonia – pleasure of wine, warmth, skin. Eudaimonia – flourishing, alignment with purpose. Chara – joy arriving without warning. Makarios – the blessed stillness of wanting nothing.
Our word descends from Old Norse happ: luck, chance. The etymology preserves something we’ve forgotten. Happiness was once understood as something that happens to you. A gift landing. Not a grade earned.
But meaning – that’s different. Meaning requires choosing. Dedication. Sometimes sacrifice. Happiness comes from serving your own needs and wants, even when that service takes the form of helping others. Meaning comes from existential commitment to something beyond yourself, even when the commitment costs you.
The distinction matters because we’ve confused the two, or worse, decided one is counterfeit. The hedonist dismisses meaning as joyless duty. The ascetic dismisses happiness as shallow indulgence. Both are wrong. Happiness brings ease and pleasure. Meaning brings accretion and contentment. Neither is better simply for its own sake. A life needs both, finding equilibrium in their ever-shifting relevance.
Happiness without meaning is vanity – pleasant but hollow, chasing doses that never accumulate into anything.
Meaning without happiness is agony – noble but grinding, burning yourself down for a cause that forgot to include you.

Researchers distinguish experienced well-being from evaluated well-being – how you feel moment to moment versus how you judge your life when stepping back. These don’t correlate the way you’d expect. Someone can feel harried and stressed through most waking hours yet describe their life as deeply meaningful. Someone else might taste frequent pleasure while sensing, underneath, an emptiness they can’t name.
The first person has meaning. The second has happiness. Neither has both.
The parent wrecked by a colicky newborn at 3am often reports more life satisfaction than the retiree with infinite leisure. Not because exhaustion is virtuous – because the exhaustion is attached to something. The hedonic treadmill grinds on for the retiree; each pleasure adapts to baseline, leaving them wanting again. The parent’s sleeplessness accumulates into a different currency altogether.
What seems to stick: connection. Commitment. Something beyond the echo chamber of your own skull. Meaning is persistent. It lingers much longer than any happy feeling. But it carries a full weight – the bliss and the misery traveling together, refusing to be separated.

There’s a phenomenon I’ve started calling emotional covering – the pressure to downplay what you actually feel in favor of what’s socially expected. We learn to perform contentment. To mask sadness with the acceptable face of someone who has their life together.
Social media amplified this. We curate. Post the vacation, not the fight that preceded it. Everyone staging happiness for everyone else, each person privately wondering why they can’t access what others apparently have figured out.
A stranger pressure runs the other direction. In certain circles, admitting happiness feels naive. As if joy proved you weren’t paying attention – weren’t sufficiently aware of the world’s suffering. Gravity performed to avoid seeming shallow.
Both pressures share a root. The belief that inner states are public business. That you owe the world an account.

Who gets permission to be happy? The question has a politics we rarely examine.
The poor person smiling is “simple” or “resilient.” The wealthy person is “living their best life.” The woman prioritizing pleasure is selfish; the man is healthy. We police joy along the lines we police everything.
This policing turns inward. I’ve watched friends sabotage their own contentment because it felt like betrayal – of politics, of family struggle, of identity as a serious person. As if suffering were solidarity.
But joy as resistance has its own lineage – people insisting on pleasure, on beauty, on celebration, precisely because others expected only their pain. Refusing to let hardship be the whole story. There’s something subversive in unperformed happiness. Not the joy of denial. The joy that exists in full acknowledgment of tragedy and still refuses to let pain have the final word.

Most people don’t want happiness. They want to want it. Different thing entirely.
Real happiness would require abandoning the identity built around discontent. The architecture feels familiar, even when it hurts. Known misery safer than unknown joy.
I recognized some of myself in that. The startup was real, as was the busyness. Yet underneath: the way prolonged sadness can pass for depth. The narrative coherence suffering provides – victimhood, or philosophical seriousness, or whatever story needs ballast. Happiness threatened eviction from a house that had been my home for years.
What I’ve learned since: happiness doesn’t require that eviction. Happy and serious coexist. Joyful and grieving. Content and still reaching. States braiding together, resisting the binary.
The world is not a place for meaning alone, any more than it’s a world of just science or just art. Neither mode is complete. Both must interact, finding balance as their relevance shifts with circumstance and season.

I’m happy most days now. And most days feel meaningful.
No pride in saying this. No prescription. The balance shifted somewhere without my trying. Good days outweigh bad. I catch myself laughing alone – at a dog’s baffled expression, at the strange sensation of being conscious. But the laughter sits inside something sturdier: work I believe in, people I’m tethered to, those no longer here I still think about, commitments that would survive my moods.
When I try to trace what changed, I can’t find a single turn. No breakthrough, no awakening. More like weathering. Edges rounding over years. Grievances losing grip. The catastrophizing voices going quiet – not suppressed, just boring. I stopped finding them interesting.
What I notice most is subtraction. I stopped trying to deserve the thing. Stopped treating happiness as a grade. Stopped believing joy required justification.
And I stopped treating meaning as martyrdom. Stopped thinking commitment had to hurt to count.

I can’t package what I’ve stumbled into. Suspicious of formulas – the five habits, the one shift. Whatever worked grew from the particular soil of one life. Rarely transplants.
If forced to name something: stop asking whether you’re happy. Stop auditing. Stop treating feelings as a performance review.
Pay attention instead – not to whether you’re happy, but to what you notice when you’re not busy measuring. Light through your window at dusk. A task completed well. The silence after a good conversation ends.
Happiness arrives in those margins. Fleeting, pleasant, gone by morning.
Meaning builds in a different register – slower, heavier, carrying its own weather.
Both matter. Both belong.
The moments when you forget to check? That’s when they find their equilibrium.

Featured song:

Similar Post: The Chrysalis